Does electronegative atoms cause shielding or deshielding of the atoms near it? (Deshielding, because shielding is caused by electrons. - GS). If there is deshielding then it is upfield and there is less of a chemical shift and if there’s shielding it’s more downfield and has more of a chemical shift correct? Am I backwards on this or do I have it correct? Thanks. (It is backwards, because shielding requires more field to overcome the shielding, so it is upfield. - GS).
This blog is a learning resource for undergraduate students studying organic chemistry. It consists of a database of actual questions and answers about organic chemistry collected by a chemistry professor teaching the subject.
Topics
- Halides-alcohols-ethers (94)
- Conjugation (60)
- Alkenes-alkynes (51)
- Carboxylic acid derivatives (39)
- Structure-bonding (39)
- Aldehydes and ketones (36)
- Alkanes-cycloalkanes (31)
- Stereochemistry (27)
- Spectroscopy (21)
- Acids-bases (19)
- Amines (18)
- Useful links (2)
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
Tuesday, February 7, 2017
Friday, February 3, 2017
Wednesday, February 1, 2017
In class you said that eclipsed doesn’t always have higher energy and gave one example on when that wasn’t true. When there are hydroxide ions and hydrogen ions next to each other is when it isn’t true? (No. Those ions do not have valency to be attached to the carbon backbone, but other ions will work. - GS).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)